I’ve been reading and writing so much about the long-term healthcare industry lately that I may have forgotten I write for Healthcare Informatics and not our sister publication, Long-Term Living.
Computer-assisted coding (CAC)—when paired with a credentialed coder—can help with faster coding of inpatient records without any reduction in accuracy, according to a recent study conducted by the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) Foundation.
The AHIMA Foundation conducted the research study in collaboration with the Cleveland Clinic to examine the impact of CAC on timeliness and data quality. It was published in an article in the July issue of theJournal of AHIMA.
The new head of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Sloan Gibson, told a Senate committee last week that he needed $17.6 billion over the next three years to hire some 1,500 doctors, 8,500 nurses and other clinicians to reduce the unconscionably long waiting times that many veterans now endure before they are able to see a doctor.
Today's health care system has your practice in a financial vise. And with every turn of the handle, the growing pressure makes practice efficiency that much more valuable — and inefficiency that much more painful. Poor management practices that would have gone unpunished in the looser market of even a few years ago now cut right into your bottom line. More, they can cause staff, payer, patient and physician dissatisfaction. They can force you into a reactive posture and deprive you of autonomy.
Do you hate your electronic health record (EHR)? Or do you just barely tolerate it? Recent reports suggest that a large percentage of U.S. physicians would answer “yes” to one of those two questions. In 2011, we reported that only 38 percent of family physicians would buy their particular EHR again if given a chance. A survey released in February of this year by MPI Group and Medical Economicsreported essentially the same thing – 60 percent of family physicians would not purchase their particular EHR again.
22% of physicians are opting out of meaningful use, according to the 2014 Medscape EHR Report. The survey found that 16% said they will never attest to meaningful use requirements, and another 6% of participants said they are abandoning meaningful use after meeting the requirements in previous years, up 2% from 2012. Overall, 78% of participating physicians said they were attesting to meaningful use Stage 1(30%) or Stage 2 (48%) in 2014.
Health insurers are now jumping aboard the telemedicine bandwagon in an effort to cut costs by allowing patients to participate in initial visits to the doctor virtually.
Health insurers are quickly finding out that a virtual visit to the doctor isn’t just convenient for patients, but more cost effective for everyone involved. Sure, the physicians save time and can work remotely, but payers are discovering the bill is much smaller when patients don’t actually need to visit the office.
With the switch from volume-based to value-based, patient-centered care taking hold across the country a lot of the accompanying talk is of team-based approaches to providing that care. At its most simple, team-based care happens when everyone works together for the greater good of the organization — breaking down the facility walls, both literally and figuratively, to maximize resources and efficiencies and improve patient outcomes. The goal?
The ICD-10 National Pilot Program is picking up steam. It's a collaborative designed to help healthcare organizations prepare for ICD-10 testing and to share best practices. The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) and Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) have taken the lead on recruiting participants and designing the end to end testing scenarios.